Fleet Wholesale Supply Company, Inc. v. Remington Arms Company, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of preliminary injunction under the WFDL based in part on lack of irreparable injury and stating that a “district court need not treat [the statutory] presumption as conclusive”
• “To say that the injury is irrep- arable means that the methods of repair (remedies at law) are inadequate.” (emphasis in original)
• irreparable injury implies inadequacy of 34 No. 17-2428 legal remedies
• irreparable injury implies inadequacy of 34 No. 17-2428 legal remedies
• irreparable injury implies inadequacy of 34 No. 17-2428 legal remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).