Skip to main content
· 4/28/1992

Fleet Bank of Maine v. Druce

Citations

  • 791 F. Supp. 17
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6382
  • 1992 WL 104567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that even if the plaintiff informed their employer of the reason for medical appointments, along with the plaintiff having made observable mistakes at work, it is not enough to conclude that the defendant knew or should have known of a relevant disability.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.