Fleck and Associates, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. Phoenix, City Of, an Arizona Municipal Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 3 || dismissal for lack of standing is one for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which should 4 ||be without prejudice
• holding that a dismissal for lack of standing is one for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, which should be without prejudice
• recognizing that when a plaintiff lacks standing, the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to address the merits of the claim and should have dismissed it without prejudice on that ground alone
• holding corporation does not possess right recognized in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 123 S. Ct. 2472 (2003
• holding that dismissal 14 for lack of standing should be without prejudice
• holding that dismissal for lack of 15 standing should be without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).