Flavorland Industries, Inc. v. Schumacker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[wjhether [the decedent’s] intoxication constituted an abandonment of his employment was for the jury to decide”
• stating that “[w]hether [the decedent’s] intoxication 6 constituted an abandonment of his employment was for the jury to decide”
• whether employee’s intoxication constituted abandonment of employment was a factual question for the jury
• where there was evidence that employer knew employee drank at a weekly meeting, expected him to buy drinks for others, encouraged the drinking, and paid for the drinks, whether employee became so intoxicated that he abandoned his employment was properly presented to the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).