Skip to main content
· 10/26/1993

FLATLEY BY FLATLEY v. Penman

Citations

  • 632 A.2d 1342
  • 429 Pa. Super. 517
  • 1993 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Clauses in a contract should not be read as independent agreements thrown together without any consideration of their combined effect.”
  • where appellee sought construction of one paragraph of release which flatly conflicted with next paragraph of release, court invoked rule of construction that terms in contract should be read as consistent with one another, and one part should not be construed so as to nullify other terms
  • where appellee sought construction of one paragraph of release which flatly conflicted with next paragraph of release, court invoked rule of construction that terms in contract should be read as consistent with one another, and one part should not be construed so as to nullify other terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Beck, Cercone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.