Flatland Realty, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the controversy involved a labor dispute although the union was insisting on a closed shop and closed shops had previously been outlawed by the Taft-Hartley Act
• holding that the controversy involved a labor dispute although the union was insisting on a closed shop and closed shops had previously been outlawed by the Taft-Hartley Act
• “The [LMRA] did not give private litigants the right to obtain injunctive relief even in those situations where a suit for damages was allowed.”
• “The [LMRA] did not give private litigants the right to obtain injunctive relief even in those situations where a suit for damages was allowed.”
• “The [LMRA] did not give private litigants the right to obtain injunctive relief even in those situations where a suit for damages was allowed.”
• \The [LMRA] did not give private litigants the right to obtain injunctive relief even in those- situations where a suit for damages was allowed.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).