Flashner Medical Partnership v. Marketing Management, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he tort claimants in this case plainly have interests in the outcome of the [insurance coverage] litigation because a declaration of noncoverage would eliminate a source of funds”
• holding that tort claimants have a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the insurance coverage controversy because the coverage determination could eliminate a source of funds
• holding that tort claimants have a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the insurance coverage controversy because the coverage determination could eliminate a source of funds
• holding that tort claimants have a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the insurance coverage controversy because the coverage determination could eliminate a source of funds
• holding that tort claimants have a real and substantial interest in the outcome of the insurance coverage controversy because the coverage determination could eliminate a source of funds
• holding that \[t]he tort claimants in this case plainly have interests in the outcome of the [insurance coverage] litigation because a declaration of noncoverage would eliminate a source of funds\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).