Skip to main content
· 7/14/2010

Flash & Partners S.P.A. v. I. E. Mfg. LLC

Syllabus

MD Counterclaim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it in another section of the same Act, it is generally presumed that Congress acts intentionally and purposely in the disparate inclusion or exclusion.”
  • “It is a ‘fundamental canon of statutory construction that the words of a statute must be read in their context and with a view to their place in the overall statutory scheme.’” (quoting Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 320 (2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Kuhlke, Mermelstein, [\Opinion by the Board\ (Krisp)]

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.