Flanary v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ex post facto claim may be presented for the first time on appeal because a categorical prohibition may not be waived
• holding that an ex post facto claim may be presented for the first time on appeal because a categorical prohibition may not be waived
• holding that an ex post facto claim may be presented for the first time on appeal because a categorical prohibition may not be waived
• “[ajppellant correctly contends that the absence of sufficient proof that he drove a motor vehicle on a public road in Knox County while intoxicated may be pointed out and relied upon in this Court, though not raised or made an issue in the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).