Flanagan v. Pearson
Citations
- 42 Tex. 1
Syllabus
<p>1. Practice.—In determining whether a judgment sought to be enjoined at suit of a discharged bankrupt was rendered for fraud committad by the defendant, it was improper to submit the matter to a jury. The question is one for the court, upon inspection of the record, including the pleadings.</p> <p>2. Conclusiveness of judgment.—In an injunction suit to restrain proceedings under a judgment for fraud in the defendant, and which was pending on appeal while bankrupt proceedings were had, the. court will not open the question of fraud.</p> <p>3. Attorney and client.—The relation o£ attorney and client is that of trust, and a violation of duty by the attorney is an act done in a fiduciary capacity under the bankrupt law.</p> <p>4. Bankruptcy does not suspend proceedings on appeal in the Supreme Court.</p> <p>5. See case of judgment for a debt made in fiduciary capacity, and not discharged by proceedings in bankruptcy.'</p>
Judges: Gould
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mandell and Wright v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court· 1969-04-16· cited 87×
- James Benjamin Hamby, Bankrupt v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, CreditorFourth Circuit· 1954-11-09· cited 55×
- Crow v. First Nat. Bank of WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1933-09-28· cited 19×
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 16×
- Miller v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court· 1881-03-08· cited 13×
- In Re GelsonE.D. New York· 1935-12-04· cited 9×
- Stickney v. ParmenterSupreme Court of Vermont· 1901-12-16· cited 8×
- Hill v. SheibleySupreme Court of Georgia· 1882-02-15· cited 7×
- Flanagan v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court· 1878-07-01· cited 6×
- Kaufman & Runge v. B. Alexander & Bro.Texas Supreme Court· 1880-06-04· cited 5×
- Mizell v. Longhorn Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1955-05-12· cited 2×
- McAdoo v. LummisTexas Supreme Court· 1875-07-01· cited 1×
- Forsyth v. VehmeyerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1898-04-18· cited 1×
- Ernst v. WiseMontgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 1950-07-01
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. Forsyth & LimerickSupreme Court· 1844-02-27· cited 282×
- Bradford v. RiceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1869-10-15· cited 30×
- Lemcke v. BoothSupreme Court of Missouri· 1871-03-15· cited 11×
- Taylor v. BonnettTexas Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 8×
- Treadwell v. HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 7×
- O'Neil v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1873-07-01· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.