FLAME S.A. v. Freight Bulk Pte. Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that district court's sanction \likely would have ... been an appropriate exercise\ of discretion, but ultimately concluding that issue had not been developed sufficiently for review on appeal
• noting that litigant “conflate[d] questions of choice of law with questions of subject matter jurisdiction”
• “Given no federal admiralty rules govern such a claim [for fraudulent conveyance], the district court appropriately looked to Virginia law.”
• ‘[A]lter ego liability made [defendant] Freight Bulk jointly and severally liable for the entirety of [plaintiffs’] judgments against [defendant] ICI.”
• no federal admiralty rule governs claims for fraudulent conveyance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).