Flaig v. Andrews Steel Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a claim for “punitive damages . . . is not an independent cause of action” but, “[r]ather, certain torts entitle a plaintiff to punitive damages”
• “[T]he Sixth Circuit [has] held that a limitation provision requiring a party to sue within one year of the loss complied with KRS § 304.14-370 . . . .”
• “the Smith opinion…remains good law within the Sixth Circuit”
• \[T]he Smith court left some significant questions unanswered.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).