Flaherty v. Filardi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying Rule 56(f) motion because “the relevant inquiry for summary judgment on the copyright and related claims ... focuses on the substantial similarities between Plaintiffs screenplay and Defendants’ finished film, both of which are in evidence”
• granting defendants’ motion to stay their obligation to file an answer pending the resolution of a summary judgment motion, where the magistrate had already “stay[ed] all discovery pending adjudication of the summary judgment motions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).