Skip to main content
· 6/12/2000

Flagstar Corp. v. Royal Surplus Lines

Citations

  • 533 S.E.2d 331
  • 341 S.C. 68
  • 2000 S.C. LEXIS 139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding order bifurcating issue of exclusion under insurance contract from issue of occurrence was not appealable
  • holding order bifurcating issue of exclusion under insurance contract from issue of occurrence was not appealable
  • trial judges are responsible for determining whether trial issues are distinct enough to warrant severability
  • “Pursuant to § 14-3-330(2), this Court has held on numerous occasions that when a trial court’s order deprives a party of a mode of trial to which it is entitled as a matter of right, such order is immediately appealable.”
  • noting right to trial by jury in law case
  • stating the traditional analysis of subsection (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Finney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.