· 6/12/2000
Flagstar Corp. v. Royal Surplus Lines
Citations
- 533 S.E.2d 331
- 341 S.C. 68
- 2000 S.C. LEXIS 139
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding order bifurcating issue of exclusion under insurance contract from issue of occurrence was not appealable
- holding order bifurcating issue of exclusion under insurance contract from issue of occurrence was not appealable
- trial judges are responsible for determining whether trial issues are distinct enough to warrant severability
- “Pursuant to § 14-3-330(2), this Court has held on numerous occasions that when a trial court’s order deprives a party of a mode of trial to which it is entitled as a matter of right, such order is immediately appealable.”
- noting right to trial by jury in law case
- stating the traditional analysis of subsection (2
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Finney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.