Flagstaff Affordable Housing Ltd. Partnership v. Design Alliance, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding economic loss rule does not apply when plaintiff and defendant are not in contractual privity
• concluding economic loss rule does not apply when plaintiff and defendant are not in contractual privity
• holding the economic loss doctrine applied to construction contracts, but noting an exception for attorneys and fiduciaries
• concluding economic loss rule does not apply when plaintiff and defendant are not in contractual privity
• concluding economic loss rule does not apply when plaintiff and defendant are not in contractual privity
• noting that a party to a construction contract can negotiate for “other damages reasonably foreseeable to the parties upon entering the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).