FLA. EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS-KANG & ASSOCIATES v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the reviewing court does not address issues not clearly set out in the issues on appeal
• affirming award of three million dollars to daughter for loss of parental companionship and pain and suffering
• noting the well-settled rule that appellate courts “do not address issues not clearly set out in the issues on appeal”
• noting: “We do not address issues not clearly set out in the issues on appeal”
• refusing to address an issue and stating “[I]n order to obtain appellate review, alleged errors relied upon for reversal must be raised clearly, concisely, and separately as points on appeal”
• “It is the function of the appellate court to review errors allegedly committed in the trial court, not to entertain for the first time on appeal, issues which the complaining party could have, and should have, but did not, present to the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).