FLA. DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONSUMER SERVICES v. City of Pompano Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that venue in an inverse condemnation action seeking compensation from the Department of Agriculture for citrus trees destroyed as part of a citrus canker eradication program was proper in the county where the trees were located
• recognizing a difference between motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action under Rule 1.140 and motions to deny class certification under Rule 1.220
• recognizing a difference between motions to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action under Rule 1.140 and motions to deny class certification under Rule 1.220
• \The trial court's order certifying the class is subject to review under an abuse of discretion standard.\
• “Rule 1.220(d) requires the court to conduct a hearing and enter an order determining whether the claim is maintainable on behalf of a class, stating its findings as to the requirements of Rule 1.220(a) and (b).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).