Skip to main content
· 12/6/2016

FJR Sand, Inc. v. Essex Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that administrative board “unreasonably relied upon personal feelings and ad hoc decision-making”
  • observing that the court is not bound by a town planning board’s interpretation of the board’s own regulations
  • stating that planning board members may not rely upon their personal feelings unsupported by evidence
  • stating that planning board may not rely upon residents’ vague and unsupported concerns, but may rely upon their statements of objective facts
  • granting a builder’s remedy provided that the applicant comply with the 21 conditions identified by the planning board
  • stating that planning board has this authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.