Skip to main content
· 1/23/1911

Fitzpatrick v. Richardson

Citations

  • 8 Teiss. 126
  • 1911 La. App. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding the general language of the CBA was not intended to by the parties to pre-empt R.C. 3310.081

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.