Fitzpatrick v. National Mobile Television

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a “four-year age difference is insufficient to raise an inference' of discriminatory action”
• holding that “common knowledge” does not establish “personal knowledge” since “‘common knowledge’ could be hearsay, or mere rumor or innuendo”
• excluding testimony it “was common knowledge” someone had been in several accidents because “the ‘common knowledge’ could be hearsay”
• dismissing plaintiff’s age discrimination claim where plaintiff was replaced by employee who was four years younger

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).