· 3/27/1961
Fitzjarrald v. Fitzjarrald
Citations
- 344 S.W.2d 584
- 233 Ark. 328
- 1961 Ark. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “where the entry through some plain error fails to correspond with the judgment that was actually rendered, the court can at a later term correct the judgment”
- holding that a nunc pro tunc order may be entered to make the record conform to the action that was in reality taken
- holding that a nunc pro tunc order may be entered to make the record conform to the action that was in reality taken
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.