Skip to main content
· 3/27/1961

Fitzjarrald v. Fitzjarrald

Citations

  • 344 S.W.2d 584
  • 233 Ark. 328
  • 1961 Ark. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “where the entry through some plain error fails to correspond with the judgment that was actually rendered, the court can at a later term correct the judgment”
  • holding that a nunc pro tunc order may be entered to make the record conform to the action that was in reality taken
  • holding that a nunc pro tunc order may be entered to make the record conform to the action that was in reality taken

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.