Fitzgibbon v. Laumeister

Citations

• 5 Cal. Unrep. 939
• 51 P. 1078

Syllabus

<p>Fraudulent Conveyances—Sufficiency of Evidence—Appeal.— Where the controlling issue was whether or not a certain conveyance was fraudulent as to creditors of the grantor, and there was abundant evidence to support the findings of the court, the conclusion drawn therefrom was not open to review, on appeal from an order denying a new trial and from a judgment in accord with such findings.</p> <p>Fraudulent Conveyances.—In an Action to Restrain the Sheriff from Selling certain real estate on execution against plaintiff’s grantor, the court did not err in denying a nonsuit, where plaintiff rested on the introduction in evidence of the deed to him, and it appeared that the execution creditor made no claim to the property, except such as was derived from such grantor subsequent to the date of such deed.</p>