Fitzgerald v. Southern Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “a deceptive practice can cause a consumer damages even if the consumer does not rely on the deceptive practice when purchasing a particular product,” such as where the seller is able to charge a higher price
• certifying class action because “the predominate issues in this case are (1) whether it is true that Enfamil® LIPIL® contains something that other brands of infant formula do not; and (2
• courts interpreting the FDUTPA “must give ‘due consideration and great weight’ to Federal Trade Commission and federal court interpretations of section 5(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act... .” (quoting Fla. Stat. Ann. § 501.204(2)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).