· 4/6/2011
Fitzgerald v. SCHROEDER VENTURES II, LLC
Citations
- 345 S.W.3d 624
- 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2522
- 2011 WL 1303276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that because defendants obtained a judgment in their favor, they were entitled to recover costs and attorney’s fees from the non-prevailing party
- noting that KB Hon^e did not reach issue of whether defendant can be prevailing party
- holding attorney’s fees provision applied beyond breach-of-contract context
- holding attorney‘s fees provision applied beyond breach-of-contract context
- defendants prevailed in trial court because judgment effected a material alteration in the party’s legal relationship
- defendants prevailed in trial court because judgment effected a material alteration in the party's legal relationship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone, Angelini, Barnard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.