Skip to main content
· 4/6/2011

Fitzgerald v. SCHROEDER VENTURES II, LLC

Citations

  • 345 S.W.3d 624
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2522
  • 2011 WL 1303276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that because defendants obtained a judgment in their favor, they were entitled to recover costs and attorney’s fees from the non-prevailing party
  • noting that KB Hon^e did not reach issue of whether defendant can be prevailing party
  • holding attorney’s fees provision applied beyond breach-of-contract context
  • holding attorney‘s fees provision applied beyond breach-of-contract context
  • defendants prevailed in trial court because judgment effected a material alteration in the party’s legal relationship
  • defendants prevailed in trial court because judgment effected a material alteration in the party's legal relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Angelini, Barnard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.