Fitzgerald v. Kempf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not satisfy Melzer when it divided mother and child’s combined budget into equal parts and ordered father to pay support in amount of child’s prorated share
• remanding for reconsideration of children’s needs when trial court required father to pay a portion of the voluntary charitable contributions and legal fees incurred by mother’s household

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).