Fitzgerald v. Gorman (In re Fitzgerald)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s state law negligence claim alleging failure to provide sufficient personnel to assist travelers exiting airplane not governed by the FAA because claim was “not an air-safety” case concerning the “design or operation of the aircraft”
• “Comair is undoubtedly correct that plaintiff's action would be preempted if it were premised solely the theory that the airstairs were defectively designed for use as an emergency exit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).