Fitzgerald v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Furthermore, RCr 6.22 entitles the defendant in a criminal proceeding to have a bill of particulars if he entertains a doubt as to the nature of the crime charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Parker v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-05-21· cited 63×
• Thomas v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1996-09-26· cited 47×
• Finch v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-09-29· cited 15×
• Roaden v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-06-25· cited 11×
• Peek v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1967-05-26· cited 8×
• Murray v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-07-02· cited 6×
• Wilson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1969-09-19· cited 4×
• Vickers v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1971-10-29· cited 3×
• Russell v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1973-02-16· cited 3×
• Thompson v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1970-12-18
• Pelfrey v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-05-12
• Whitaker v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 1972-11-03