Fitzer v. Security Dynamics Technologies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “bespeaks caution” doctrine protects statements accompanied by cautionary language
• dismissing complaint when plaintiff failed to show with particularity the extent to which demand slowed
• finding particularity requirements met only because specific positions of employee-contacts were provided
• “poor management is a risk that every investor takes” and “[d]amages flowing therefrom are not actionable under the securities laws”
• “Any statements made by the defendants relating to whether [Defendant] was ‘well positioned’ are ultimately no more than nonactionable ‘puffing.’
• “Any statements made by the defendants relating to whether [their company] was ‘well positioned’ are ultimately no more than nonactionable ‘puffing.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).