Fitzburgh v. Everingham

Citations

• 6 Paige Ch. 29
• 1836 N.Y. LEXIS 276
• 1836 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 50

Syllabus

<p>The answer or affidavit of the defendant in a creditor’s bill, that he has not property to the amount of $ 100, is not a full defence to the suit; nor is it a sufficient reason for refusing to appoint a receiver.</p> <p>Upon the usual order on a creditor’s bill to appoint a receiver, and for the defendant to deliver over to such receiver his property and effects on oath, the defendant is only bound to answer such interrogatories as relate to the subject of the proceeding before the master.</p>