Fitz v. The Amelie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no “per se ground for challenge” where three members had received legal assistance from the assistant trial counsel
• finding no “per se ground for challenge” where three members had received legal assistance from the assistant trial counsel
• no abuse of discretion to deny challenge against three members who had received legal assistance from assistant trial counsel
• former legal assistance clients of trial counsel not disqualified as court members
• “offieial acquaintance with government witnesses [is] not per se disqualifying”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).