Fite v. Comtide Nashville, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “an ‘at will’ employee (like plaintiffs here) may still sue for discriminatory discharge under Section 1981”
• “Section 1981 and the THRA provide protection against workplace retaliation and claims under both statutes are analyzed under the Title VII burden-shifting framework.”
• “While the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure permit service by mail, unless the package is actually received and signed for by the defendant or his “authorized agent,” service of process is not effective.”
• “While the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure permit service by mail, unless the package is actually received and signed for by the defendant or his “authorized agent,” service of process is not effective.”
• “While the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure permit service by mail, unless the package is actually received and signed for by the defendant or his ‘authorized agent,’ service of process by mail delivery is not effective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).