Fisher v. Wilkoski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a “district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend is ‘particularly broad’” when the plaintiff has previously amended its complaint
• noting that a district court’s discretion to deny leave to amend complaint is especially broad where plaintiff previously filed an amended complaint
• discussing that 2 18 U.S.C. § 1341 makes mail fraud a criminal offense
• stating that “futile amendments” to a RICO complaint “should not be permitted”
• discussing the Restatement’s position that misrepresentations of law are not actionable if they do not “include! ] a misrepresentation of fact”
• affirming dismissal of a fraud claim because the plaintiff 22 failed to allege enough facts to meet the lower standard applied to fraud committed by a defendant 23 with special expertise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).