Fisher v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Indiana has long held . . . that [Criminal Rule 4] does not apply when a person is incarcerated in a foreign jurisdiction”; we apply the IAD instead
• finding it not necessary to address whether defendant demonstrated actual prejudice where other three Barker factors weighed in favor of defendant and against State
• relying on Howard to conclude that Criminal Rule 4 did not provide a basis for Fisher’s discharge
• court characterized delay as “undoubtedly long” where defendant had not yet been brought to trial eight years after his arrest and over three years after he presented himself for prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Scott Logan v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2014-09-24· cited 26×
• Heinzman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-27· cited 12×
• Kelvin Fuller v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-09-10· cited 5×
• Ricky E. Arion v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-06-22· cited 2×
• Eddie Spalding v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-08-09· cited 1×
• Cory Heinzman v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-06-27
• Felix C. Sickels v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-01-06
• Jeffrey E. Akard v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-10-22
• Justin Noelker v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-05-06
• Stanley v. Watson v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2020-10-21