Fisher v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• SEPTA employees not employees of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania under a 1935 state statute providing compensation for employees on active duty in the military reserves
• SEPTA employees not employees of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania under a 1935 state statute providing compensation for employees on active duty in the military reserves
• SEPTA employees held not to be employees of the Commonwealth for purposes of 1935 statute providing compensation to Commonwealth employees for active duty of reservists of military
• SEPTA employees held not to be employees of the Commonwealth for purposes of 1935 statute providing compensation to Commonwealth employees for active duty of reservists of military
• “We do not believe that the Legislature intended SEPTA to be a Commonwealth agency in the traditional sense or for SEPTA employees to be considered Commonwealth employees for purposes of other legislative enactments.”
• \We do not believe that the Legislature intended SEPTA to be a Commonwealth agency in the traditional sense or for SEPTA employees to be considered Commonwealth employees for purposes of other legislative enactments.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).