California Court of Appeal· 3/13/1963
Fisher v. Parsons
Citations
- 213 Cal. App. 2d 829
- 29 Cal. Rptr. 210
- 1963 Cal. App. LEXIS 2803
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A lease which becomes immediately effective vests in all respects at that time, and the rights under it, through exercisable in the future, do not have the characteristics of a contingency or future estate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ashburn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court· 1984-08-30· cited 319×
- Bed, Bath & Beyond of La Jolla, Inc. v. La Jolla Village Square Venture PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-02-10· cited 50×
- C9 Ventures v. SVC-West, L.P.California Court of Appeal· 2012-01-27· cited 46×
- Casey v. LupkesSupreme Court of Iowa· 1979-12-19· cited 31×
- Reagh v. KelleyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-09-01· cited 28×
- Ginsberg v. GamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-04-30· cited 28×
- Dallman Co. v. Southern Heater Co.California Court of Appeal· 1968-05-29· cited 21×
- Advance Medical Diagnostic Laboratories v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-05-14· cited 14×
- Shaver v. ClantonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-06-30· cited 11×
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. SmithNinth Circuit· 1964-09-09· cited 8×
- Bank Of America National Trust And Savings Association v. James A. A. SmithNinth Circuit· 1964-09-09· cited 3×
- Encore Glass, Inc. v. Anchor Glass Container Corp. (In Re Anchor Glass Container Corp.)M.D. Florida· 2006-07-21
- Wharf, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2021-03-30
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-06-28· cited 239×
- Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court· 1939-03-20· cited 77×
- Great Western Distillery Products, Inc. v. John A. Wathen Distillery Co.California Supreme Court· 1937-12-29· cited 59×
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-09-20· cited 42×
- Hollywood Motion Picture Equipment Co. v. FurerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-09-03· cited 41×
- Raynor v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-05-20· cited 36×
- Haggerty v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-06-19· cited 33×
- Roberts v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1958-10-17· cited 31×
- Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal· 1953-08-14· cited 29×
- Lloyd v. KleefischCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-12-11· cited 28×
- San Francisco Brewing Corp. v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-08-10· cited 27×
- Dallapi v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-06-24· cited 26×
- El Rio Oils Ltd. v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Co.California Court of Appeal· 1949-12-20· cited 26×
- Erickson v. BootheCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-04-21· cited 24×
- Morrison v. RossignolCalifornia Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 22×
- Zimco Restaurants, Inc. v. Bartenders Union, Local 340California Court of Appeal· 1958-11-18· cited 21×
- Laughlin v. HaberfeldeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-01-30· cited 20×
- Diffenderfer v. Board of President of St. Louis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1894-02-27· cited 19×
- Aero Bolt & Screw Co. v. IaiaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1960-05-09· cited 17×
- Ames-Brooks Co. v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-05-31· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.