Skip to main content
· 3/9/1990

Fisher v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 895 F.2d 1073
  • 15 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1484
  • 12 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1044
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 3326

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an allegation of improper benefits calculation not raised in the second amended complaint but in response to a summary judgment motion is not properly before the court
  • refusing to award penalties when there was “[n]othing in either the request or the response indicat[ing] that [Defendants] knew or should have known” what the claimant was requesting
  • “[A] claim that is not raised in the Complaint but, rather, is raised only in response to a motion for summary judgment is not properly before the court.”
  • because plaintiff did not raise a claim in their amended complaint and only in response to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, it was not properly before the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.