Fisher v. Electronic Data Systems

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “it is clear” that an employee’s complaint about harassment “is a ‘protected activity’”
• granting in part and denying in part motion for summary judgment
• “Since Ellerth, the critical question, regardless of how the plaintiff articulates her claims, is whether a “tangible employment action” occurred.”
• preemption not required when intentional infliction of emotional distress claim arises from an alleged assault or battery
• considering termination as the adverse employment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).