Fisher v. Certain Interested Underwriters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• disagreeing that payment was a confession of judgment where the insurer indicated in its cover letter forwarding the payment \that payment was made because of a recent decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida\
• stating, with regard to construing a policy too narrowly, that “[t]o do so would require us to turn a blind eye to what common sense dictates”
• determining existence of a name perils policy after analyzing the policy’s language insuring for direct physical loss to a property, described in a particular coverage, caused by a specified peril, subject to specified exclusions was a named perils policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).