Skip to main content
· 5/5/1988

Fishe & Kleeman v. Aquarius Condo. Ass'n

Citations

  • 524 So. 2d 1012
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 301
  • 13 Fla. L. Weekly 301
  • 1988 Fla. LEXIS 553
  • 1988 WL 43380

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the bar against dismissal terminates after the trial court has taken action in response to the notice for trial”
  • holding that “the bar against dismissal terminates after the trial court has taken action in response to the notice for trial”
  • noting that an attorney should not pressure a trial judge
  • “Failure of the trial court to set the case for trial precludes dismissal for failure to prosecute.”
  • “[Ojnce a party files a proper rule 1.440(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ehrlich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.