Fishburne v. ATI Systems International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the Appellate Panel may find an impairment rating different from that suggested by expert testimony
• upholding the commission's findings regarding the extent of injury because the commission determined the claimant \was not credible\
• stating the Commission is the sole fact finder in workers' compensation cases and any questions of credibility of witnesses must be resolved by the Commission
• upholding the commission's findings regarding the extent of injury because the commission determined the claimant \was not credible\
• noting the Commission is given discretion to weigh and consider all the evidence, including both lay and expert testimony
• stating the Appellate Panel is the sole fact finder in workers' compensation cases and any questions of credibility of witnesses must be resolved by the Appellate Panel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).