Fish v. Trap Free Mont. Pub. Lands

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the plaintiffs failed to meet their burden to justify a significant delay of six years
• determining no “undue delay” where “[t]he facts and circumstances relating to the substance ... of the new claim were apparently known [to the Plaintiff] from the beginning.”
• noting that courts have traditionally used the workweek compliance approach such that, “so long as total pay at the end of the week divided by the number of hours worked is no less than the minimum wage rate, [29 U.S.C.] section 206 has not been violated.”
• denying leave after a six-year delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).