Fish v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s denial of discretionary costs for expert witness fees despite the fact that the court did not evaluate each cost item by item
• not an abuse of discretion to find that the cost of hiring experts on accident reconstruction and medical diagnosis is routine and not exceptional in personal injury cases
• not an abuse of discretion to find that the cost of hiring experts on accident reconstruction and medical diagnosis is routine and not exceptional in personal injury cases
• Supreme Court affirmed the district court’s denial of discretionary costs for expert fees where the district court found such costs common in a personal injury case and where such experts routinely testify
• finding hiring of expert for accident reconstruction was routine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).