Court of Appeals of Washington· 9/8/1978
Fischnaller v. Thurston County
Citations
- 21 Wash. App. 280
- 584 P.2d 483
- 1978 Wash. App. LEXIS 1922
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that county auditor could reject declaration of candidacy only if not required to interpret constitutional or statutory language
- holding that county auditor could reject declaration of candidacy only if not required to interpret constitutional or statutory language
- county home rule charter commission member
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Soule
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 2,034×
- Chimento v. StarkD. New Hampshire· 1973-01-22· cited 92×
- Hadnott v. AmosM.D. Alabama· 1970-10-19· cited 76×
- Electronic Industries Ass'n v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1971-03-22· cited 70×
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court· 1910-02-03· cited 20×
- Lawrence v. City of IssaquahWashington Supreme Court· 1974-07-25· cited 19×
- State ex rel. Baker River & Shuiksan Railroad v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court· 1909-02-10· cited 14×
- Moen v. ErlandsonWashington Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 9×
- Kraft v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1977-08-31· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.