Skip to main content
· 11/19/2007

Fischer v. S/Y NERAIDA

Citations

  • 508 F.3d 586
  • 2008 A.M.C. 100
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26698
  • 2007 WL 4097698

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “Act of God” defense “sensibly requires a showing that all reasonable measures would have been futile”
  • noting the appellant bears a heavy burden, especially where the evidence is largely testimonial, because the district judge had the ability to observe the witnesses and evaluate their testimony and credibility ■ firsthand
  • reviewing district court’s determination that reasonable steps were taken for “clear error”
  • “[I]f a ship’s owner acted reasonably in preparing for a storm, the owner is not liable even if the ship eventually causes damage to another’s property.”
  • doctrines are the same except the vessels to which they apply
  • doctrines are the same except the vessels to which they apply

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Hull, Tjoflat

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.