Fischer v. Stout

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that voter's intent was clear where voter used pen rather than the punchcard machine
• proposing to amend AS 15.45.340 and .360, which govern referendum petitions, and AS 15.45.580 and .600, which govern recall petitions
• proposing to amend AS 15.45.340 and .360, which govern referendum petitions, and AS 15.45.580 and .600, which govern recall petitions
• discussing the method for \determin[ing] the effect of any bias that affected individual votes in a random fashion\
• discussing the method for “determin[ing] the effect of any bias that affected individual votes in a random fashion”
• rejecting recount challenge after determining that pro rata reduction did not change election result

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).