Fischer v. Dallas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff had not placed his mental condition at issue when he made a “garden-variety claim of emotional distress, not a claim of psychic injury or psychiatric disorder” (citation omitted)
• holding plaintiffs mental condition not at issue when defendant made Fed.R.Civ.P. 34 request for psychiatrist’s documents concerning plaintiff even though complaint set forth “garden variety” claim for emotional distress
• mental health is not placed in issue by “garden-variety claim of emotional distress” and mental examination not warranted
• party does not waive psychotherapist-patient privilege by asserting a garden variety claim of emotional distress, not a claim of psychic injury or psychiatric disorder arising from defendant’s alleged discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).