Fischer v. Borsher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the RFRA “protects individuals from substantial burdens on religious exercise that occur when the government coerces action one’s religion forbids, or forbids action one’s reli gion requires; it is not a means to force one’s religious practices upon others”
• dismissing a secular, for-profit company's claims for declaratory and injunctive relief
• Women’s Preventive Healthcare regulations do not require “that plaintiffs alter their behavior in a manner that will directly and inevitably prevent [them] from acting in accordance with their religious beliefs”
• “the religious employer exemption presents a strong argument in favor of neutrality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).