Firststone Heights LLC (1512 Forest Trail Apts) v. Travis Central Appraisal District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court could not rely on observations of lay witnesses of events that occurred before law enforcement arrived to determine whether defendant was guilty of loitering and prowling
• evaluating sufficiency of the evidence to establish a new law violation as a basis to revoke probation under the de novo standard
• witnesses’ reports could not be used to support loitering or prowling; only officer’s observations could be considered
• “At the violation hearing, the State abandoned all allegations of violation except for k.4.”
• “the witnesses’ report of individuals knocking on their door cannot be considered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).