Skip to main content
· 3/29/2001

First Union National Bank v. Paribas

Citations

  • 135 F. Supp. 2d 443
  • 2001 WL 310624

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing fraud claims against French bank in favor of London, where fraudulent activity was centered
  • dismissing fraud claims against French bank in favor of London, where fraudulent activity was centered
  • dismissing fraud claims against French bank in favor of London, where fraudulent activity was centered
  • declining to decide whether New York or English law applies on a motion to dismiss, because \because it is not yet clear that there is a conflict between New York and English law and because the litigation is at a preliminary stage\ (footnotes omitted)
  • likelihood that court would have to apply English law to part or entirety of case “cuts to some degree in defendants’ favor”
  • likelihood that court would have to apply English law to part or entirety of case “cuts to some degree in defendants’ favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.