Skip to main content
· 4/7/1999

First Union National Bank v. Burke

Citations

  • 48 F. Supp. 2d 132
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6415
  • 1999 WL 280274

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • The EFTA \does not contain language from which it can be reasonably inferred that Congress intended to disrupt other federal laws including the National Bank[ ] Act by an implicit reservation of the power to administratively regulate banks to the states.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arterton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.